Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Broadway et al v. Avent America, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00997
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Broadway, Tomeka Broadway, Naayda Lanza and others
Defendant:
Avent America, Inc. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rasmussen et al v. Handi-Craft Company
as 4:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Paul Rasmussen, Paul Rasmussen, Melissa Melendez and others
Defendant:
Handi-Craft Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. King
as 0:2008cv06064
Petitioner:
David Johnson
Respondent:
John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Collier et al v. Avent America, Inc et al. ***DO NOT File in This Case. All documents and pleadings should be filed in the main case 08-md-01967-ODS.***
as 4:2008cv00696
Plaintiff:
David Johnson and Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
Avent America, Inc , Handicraft Company, Evenflo Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wolf v. Johnson
as 0:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Wolf
Defendant:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dingle
as 0:2007cv04793
Petitioner:
David Johnson
Respondent:
Lynn Dingle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Edwards v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Sherwood Edwards
Defendant:
David Johnson, Jimmy Sims and Fredrick Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.