Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 668
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Graham v. United States
as 22-3075
Petitioner / Appellant: William Charles Graham
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Graham v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02377
Plaintiff: Chester C. Graham
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Minnesota/Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
In re: William Graham
as 22-2968
Petitioner: In re: William Charles Graham
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04124
Plaintiff: Michael Dutcher
Defendant: Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: William Graham
as 22-2794
Petitioner: In re: William Charles Graham
William Graham v. United States
as 22-2609
Plaintiff / Appellant: William Charles Graham
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
Hicks v. Griffin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff: Brian James Hicks
Defendant: Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarell Terry v. James Dycus, et al
as 22-2396
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant: James Dycus, Warden, ADC, Danny Norment, Sgt., ADC, Morieon Kelly, Sgt., ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Sykes, Sergeant and John Munn

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?