Cases 81 - 90 of 1,372
Evans v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02876
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Evans
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Putman v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Putman
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byakatonda et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02829
Plaintiff:
Stephen Byakatonda, Michael Byamukama, Nicholson Bay Byansi and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Musiime et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02839
Plaintiff:
Alex Musiime, Allan Musiime, Evas Musiime and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Federated Reserve Insurance Company v. T&E Service Co. Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Federated Reserve Insurance Company
Defendant:
T&E Service Co. Inc., Ballance Contracting Services, LLC, Acuity, a Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Barefield v. Rondoni et al
as 6:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Sgt. Oscar Rondoni, Program Warden Tasha Griffin, Deputy Warden Randy Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shanklin v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Janet Shanklin
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Steven M. Ebert and Evan P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
