Cases 81 - 90 of 893
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 1:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 4:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearmen v. Newbron et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Gary Spearmen
Defendant:
K Newbron and Mcuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Newbron et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dashan Bailey
Defendant:
K Newbron and Mcuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunigan et al v. AG Resource Insurance LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Victor Lance Dunigan, Robert Dale Dunigan, Paul Lemoine Johnson and others
Defendant:
AG Resource Insurance LLC, CGB Diversified Services Inc doing business as Diversified Crop Insurance Services and John K Majure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Causey v. Cowell et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Causey
Defendant:
Billy Cowell, Shelia K Armstrong, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazurek v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Gavino P Mazurek and Gavino Mazurek
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Deep Distribution et al
as 4:2021cv01197
Plaintiff:
Tony D Robinson
Defendant:
Deep Distribution, J Dorian, Shayla K Taulbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qualls v. Russellville, City of et al
as 4:2021cv01073
Plaintiff:
David Qualls
Defendant:
Russellville Arkansas, City of, J Richardson, K Cromer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Parker et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
Tessane S Parker, Gaylon Lay, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
