Cases 1 - 10 of 1,911
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Sara Kulas, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jameson et al v. Roblox Corporation et al
as 0:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Josh Jameson and Tawney Jameson
Defendant:
Roblox Corporation, Apple, Inc. and Jane & John Does I-XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ICC Motor Fuel I, LLC v. Brew Mex, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
ICC Motor Fuel I, LLC
Defendant:
Brew Mex, LLC, Brew Oil, LLC, Brew, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ICC Motor Fuel I, LLC v. Brew Mex, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
ICC Motor Fuel I, LLC
Defendant:
Brew Mex, LLC, Brew Oil, LLC, Brew, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Childress v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Myles Childress
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J.N. et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
J. N., I. N., A. N. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier, LLC and Torian Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
