Cases 1 - 10 of 37
United States v. Pedro Zambrano
as 24-2004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Zambrano, also known as Peter Rivera, also known as JR Acevedo, also known as Manuel Acevedo, also known as Jorge Meraz, also known as Rafael Ramirez, also known as John Crish, also known as Jose Perez, Jose Zavala
Alejandro Cataneda-Zavala v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1437
Petitioner:
Alejandro Antonio Cataneda-Zavala
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Alejandra Hernandez-Zavala v. United States of America
as 24-1015
Petitioner:
Alejandra Hernandez-Zavala, also known as Alejandra Castillo-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Zavala v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Erick Zavala
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Hernandez-Zavala v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Alejandra Hernandez-Zavala and Alejandra Castillo-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parker v. Coast to Coast Carports, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02110
Plaintiff:
Sharonna Parker
Defendant:
Jorge Zavala and Coast to Coast Carports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zavala v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv02095
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola Zavala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
