Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bray et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bray, Robert Davies, Steven Alon Flowers Hart and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Andrews v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Does, Brandon Johnson, Bryant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02150
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cooper, Eric Vihinen, Joseph Topping and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Eibeck, Tromos, Kenton County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Bradley et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Defendant:
Toni Bradley, DeAngelo Earl, D Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01104
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Ward , James Abbott , Victor Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Missouri
as 4:2017cv00139
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Jackson County Detention Center
as 4:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Jackson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2016cv00137
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Mario Peart and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
