Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hocking v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hocking
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, D Green, M Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Grimes v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
John Grimes, Sr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Provencio v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Kevin Provencio
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, D Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Oronde D Holmes
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
David A Miller
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Mark Thurman
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, D Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Barnes v. Clark Green, et al
as 21-3937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Clark Green, Officer (originally named as C Green), Dillon McKee, Officer (originally named as Dillion), Kevin Archer, Intake Officer, Dallas County Detention Center (Originally named as "Doe") and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
