Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ledbetter et al v. Oller et al
as 4:2020cv04037
Defendant:
Daniel "Frog" Oller and City of Hope
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ledbetter and Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim Holston v. The City of Hope, Arkansas, et al
as 20-1411
Defendant / Appellee:
Catherine Cook, in her individual and official capacity as City Manager, The City of Hope, Arkansas, A Public Body Corporate and Politic and Larry York, in his individual and official capacity as Public Works Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kim Holston
Ledbetter et al v. Oller et al
as 4:2019cv04075
Defendant:
Daniel "Frog" Oller and City of Hope
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ledbetter and Aaron Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Munn v. Crissy Hunt, et al
as 16-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Willie Munn
Plaintiff:
Mary Eliza Munn
Defendant - Appellee:
Crissy Hunt, Parole Officer, City of Hope, Casey Parker, Police Office, Nashville Police Department, Jailer Dustin Wakefield, Police Officer, Nashville Police Department and others
Nelson v. City of Hope Hempstead County Arkansas et al
as 4:2016cv04009
Plaintiff:
Alisa Nelson
Defendant:
City of Hope Hempstead County Arkansas, Ramsey and Catherine Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerry Martin v. Phillip Russell, et al
as 08-2577
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jerry Martin
Defendant:
Donald Blair, Individually and in his official capacity as a City of Hope Police Department Officer, Darryl Howard, Individually and in his official capacity as a City of Hope Police Department Officer and City of Hope, AR
Defendant - Appellant:
Phillip Russell, Individually and in his official capacity, Kim Tomlin, Individually and in her official capacity, Tate Booker, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
