Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crabb v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Crabb
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Harmon v. Crabb
as 5:2020cv06011
Plaintiff:
Diego Montez Harmon
Defendant:
Jason Crabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tepoel v. Conley et al
as 0:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Tepoel
Defendant:
William M. Conley, Jane Doe Conley, Barbara B. Crabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newport v. Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2016cv06059
Plaintiff:
Scott Eugene Newport
Defendant:
Bruce Parsa, Judy Hadley and Jason Crabb
Interested_party:
Missouri Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2016cv06054
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Moreland
Defendant:
Northwest Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, James B Reynolds, Lisa Witcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabb v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Travis Crabb
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Tiffany Eichler and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabb v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv03671
Plaintiff:
Claude Crabb
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Crabb v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2014cv03009
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Crabb
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crabb v. Mississippi County et al
as 3:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
Danial Crabb
Defendant:
Mississippi County, Blytheville Police Department and Jessica Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
