Cases 1 - 10 of 572
McBrien v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Casey Dale McBrien
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Casey Franklin and Peggy Franklin
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairbanks et al v. Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Defendant:
Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stout et al v. WPX Energy Williston, LLC
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Casey Lyn Stout and Jenna Mae Stout
Defendant:
WPX Energy Williston, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moffett v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Casey D. Moffett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kuntz v. Toyota Material Handling, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Casey Kuntz
Defendant:
Toyota Material Handling, Inc. and Lift Pro Equipment Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Marquizs Henry
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Nurse Casey Sanford and Dr. Deanna Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farland Gilliehan v. St. Charles County Court, et al
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
Farland L. Gilliehan
Defendant:
St. Charles County Circuit Court, St. Charles County Jail, Dan Keen, St. Charles County Jail Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
