Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andy Timmons, Inc. d/b/a Lost Draw Vineyards, et al v. Bayer Crop Science, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Andy Timmons, Inc. doing business as Lost Draw Vineyards, ALEGRIA DE LA VIDA VINEYARDS, LLC, ALTA LOMA VINEYARD PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROP SCIENCE, LP, Monsanto Company and BASF Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Terry v. Dycus et al
as 2:2020cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
Robinson, Betty Leaks, Cornelieous Granville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2020cv06056
Defendant:
Disc. Hearing Ofcr Keith Waddle, Corporal Caylib McGuire, Corporal J. Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelious v. Craighead County Detention Center
as 3:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jeffery William Cornelious
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01709
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams , Bertha Alexander , Marsha Kay Anderson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Otis Cornelious v. Larry Denney
as 14-1709
Petitioner - Appellant:
Otis Cornelious
Respondent - Appellee:
Larry Denney
Cornelious v. Denney
as 4:2012cv00443
Petitioner:
Otis Cornelious
Respondent:
Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wheeler v Bell
as 2:2011cv00092
Defendant:
Bell
Plaintiff:
Cornelious Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
