Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cook v. Kansas City, Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Lynn D. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and Officer Papabathini #50149
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Jackson County Court System
as 4:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Lynn D. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Jackson County Court System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Jackson County Prosecutor et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Lynn D. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Jackson County Prosecutor and Kansas City, MO Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cook v. Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO
as 4:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Lynn D. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Smith et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Tyrone K. Smith and Sharon M. Baker-Smith
Defendant:
Daniel D. Cook and Sunbelt Solomon Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cook v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Thomas Peeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv04128
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ryan Crews, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholes D Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Cook, Jr. v. Randy Gibbs
as 21-1059
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gene D. Cook, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs, Warden/Iowa State Penitentiary
Hart v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01126
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Connie D Cook, Tina Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Gibbs
as 4:2020cv00104
Petitioner:
Gene D. Cook, Jr.
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
