Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Furr v. Medicredit Inc.
as 4:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Jude Furr
Defendant:
Medicredit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shoup et al v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Ashley Furr Shoup and Zachary Shoup
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services and Cindy Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bowen v. Furr et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Douglas Furr and Willie Jenkins
Plaintiff:
Carl A Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaWayne Natt v. Calvin Ford, et al
as 19-2200
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Morris, Grimes Unit, Jerry Howard, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, James A. Hill, Sergeant, Grimes Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LaWayne Natt
Natt v. Ford et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
James A Hill, Calvin Ford, Michael Whately and others
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Furr v. Hazelwood, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2018cv01400
Defendant:
Brendan Gilbert, City of Hazelwood, Missouri, Matthew Curry and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Furr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Furr v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Furr
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley , Randy Watson and Joshua Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Natt v. Ford et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
Calvin Ford, Michael Whatley, Furr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gloria Johnson, et al v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 16-2923
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Gloria Johnson, Robin Wronski, Marissa Boylan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Johnson et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Gloria Johnson , Robin Wronski , Marissa Boylan and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
