Cases 1 - 10 of 401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cape, PLC et al v. Cape Law PC et al
as 5:2024cv05104
Plaintiff:
Joel E. Cape, PLC doing business as Cape Law Firm, PLC and Joel E. Cape
Defendant:
Cape Law PC, Josh Morgenstem and Akiko Endo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irankunda v. King Law Firm et al
as 4:2024cv04070
Plaintiff:
Eric Janson Irankunda
Defendant:
King Law Firm, Boyce Law Firm and Smithfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
