Cases 1 - 10 of 12
R. L. Mlazgar Associates, Inc. v. Legrand Holding, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
R. L. Mlazgar Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Legrand Holding, Inc.
Sens et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 0:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
Eleonore Sens, Chandan Khanna and Robin Legrand
Defendant:
David Hutchinson, Officers John Does 1-4 and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeGrand v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2022cv04168
Plaintiff:
John L. LeGrand
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Carpenter and Dan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rulo v. Precythe et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Rulo
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Eljay L. Noel, Unknown Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barth et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jill Barth , Gary Falen , Linda Farrell and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LeGrand v. DXC Technology Services LLC
as 0:2017cv04058
Defendant:
DXC Technology Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Tracy LeGrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long v. KCMO Police Department et al
as 4:2016cv01189
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Long
Defendant:
KCMO Police Department, Jackson County Detention Center, Erik Enderlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John LeGrand v. Darin Young, et al
as 15-2634
Petitioner - Appellant:
John LeGrand
Respondent - Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
LeGrand v. Young et al
as 4:2014cv04160
Petitioner:
John LeGrand
Respondent:
Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv01765
Plaintiff:
Angela Davidson , Phyllis Kidder , Ann Clark and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
