Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard et al v. Orkin Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Allison Bernard, Marques Bernard and Allison Parker
Defendant:
Orkin Inc doing business as Orkin Pest Control, Orkin LLC and Rollins Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States v. Marques Armstrong, Jr.
as 23-2432
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marques Dwell Armstrong, Jr., also known as Kease
Tavron v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
M Jackson, III, C Johnson, J Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2022cv00361
Petitioner:
Marques M. Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quarterman v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Curlie Marque Quarterman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Curlie Quarterman
as 21-1237
Defendant / Appellant:
Curlie Marque Quarterman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Curlie Quarterman
as 21-1236
Defendant / Appellant:
Curlie Marque Quarterman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
