Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dudley v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, State Trooper Jacob Meadows and State of Arkansas Headquarters Troop 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covert v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Harold Moses Covert
Defendant:
Marquis D Taylor and M Demery, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Willis v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Q Willis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Willis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Caffey et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant:
Ahmari Caffey, Head, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raiford v. Payne
as 4:2020cv01510
Plaintiff:
Monauris Marquis Raiford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2020cv00946
Plaintiff:
Marquis Smith
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
McCoy v. Creggett et al
as 4:2020cv00780
Defendant:
S Kyle Hunter, John Kearney, Marquis Creggett and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
