Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parker v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Teresa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Histories Antiques & Collectables v. Horace Samuel Parker Jr. Rev Trust et al
as 2:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Histories Antiques & Collectables doing business as Brian D. DuBuc
Defendant:
Horace Samuel Parker Jr. Rev Trust, David A & Kimberly Parker, Gaither Law and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Parker v. USA
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Cecil Parker, Jr.
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr.
Parker v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00951
Plaintiff:
John W Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Parker v. West Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Tommie L Parker, Jr
Defendant:
West Memphis Police Department, Crittenden County Detention Center, Crittenden County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2018cv06131
Plaintiff:
James D. Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker v. Beasley et al
as 2:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
George Washington Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Gene Beasley and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parker v. Cage
as 3:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sammie H Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Kay Cage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. St. Clair County Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
William E Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
St. Clair County Missouri , Ronald Snodgrass and Mike Mullaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
