Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Alana Phillips v. Carlos Rocha, et al
as 23-3139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Michael Myers, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Leon Philpot, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member and others
United States v. Esteban Rocha
as 23-2526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Esteban Dejesus Huerta Rocha
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
da Rocha v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv05076
Plaintiff:
Claudia Bianca da Rocha
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rocha v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2021cv00892
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC, 3M Occupational Safety LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Efrain Rocha Perez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-1632
Petitioner:
Efrain Rocha Perez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Jacqueline Arndt, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Waren Kilburn, Dwayne Carr, Jose Rocha and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Arndt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ferguson, Ahrens Dederscheck, Ernest Cano and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
