Cases 1 - 10 of 410
Shaw v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
Michael Shaw
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Singh et al
as 6:2024cv06046
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shaw
Defendant:
Daljit Singh and Blue Line Distribution Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shaw v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 4:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shaw
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Shaw v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Juan V. Brown
Defendant:
Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction, Marvin Brannum, Unknown Hampton CO II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw v. USA
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Antonio Shaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
