Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund et al v. Spalding Constructors LLC
as 4:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Laborers Pension Fund, Construction Industry Laborers Welfare Fund, Patrick R. Pryor and others
Defendant:
Spalding Constructors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brust et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall, Timmie Jones, John Gainey and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Boyer et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02134
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson, Nicklaus Napier, John Cifuni and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Spalding v. 5 Star Life Insurance Company et al
as 6:2018cv06070
Defendant:
5 Star Life Insurance Company and Matthew D. Ramsey
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Spalding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brock v. Spalding, et al
as 2:2018cv04036
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Nathan Brock
Defendant:
Jane Spalding, Cheryl L Scherer, Douglas Prudden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Prudden et al
as 2:2017cv04083
Plaintiff:
Paul Tripp
Defendant:
Douglas Prudden, Alan Earls, D J Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Greene County Justice Center et al
as 6:2017cv03120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carlton Dunlap, Sr
Defendant:
Greene County Justice Center, Jim Arnott, Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
