Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Anthony v. Swope Health Services et al
as 4:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Aireania Anthony
Defendant:
Swope Health Services and D.D.S. Marquita Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0233 Remand of tort action involving federally funded business
Henderson v. Atlantic Track and Runway Services, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Davevon Henderson
Defendant:
Atlantic Track and Runway Services, LLC, Rick Swope and John Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harold Covert v. James Plummer, et al
as 23-1557
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Harold Moses Covert
Defendant / Appellant:
James Plummer, Captain (Originally named J Plummer), Mary Lloyd, Lieutenant (Originally named M Lloyd) and Laquista Swopes, Sergeant (Originally named L Swopes)
Defendant:
Hampton, Sergeant
Swopes v. Martin
as 2:2023cv04052
Plaintiff:
LaRon Swopes
Defendant:
Raina Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Swope Community Builders MI, LP
as 4:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Charles Davenport
Defendant:
Swope Community Builders MI, LP
White v. Does et al
as 2:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Derrick White
Defendant:
Does Phillips County Detention Center Staff, Swopes, Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dell Reed, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jovell Swopes
as 22-2625
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jovell L. Swopes
Karr v. Swopes et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Karr, III
Defendant:
Swopes and Jeff Haegwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karr v. Swopes et al
as 5:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Karr, III
Defendant:
Officer Swopes and Jail Commander Jeff Haegwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
