Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Dale Williams, Sr. v. Nancy Moore, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Moore, Sara Kulas, MSOP--Moose Lake Group Supervisor Special Services, Samantha J. Suhonen, MSOP--Moose Lake mailroom personnel and others
Elmore v. Maries County, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Linda Elmore
Defendant:
Victor Stratman, Ed Fagre, Doug Drewel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prosper v. Angrimson et al
as 0:2021cv00627
Defendant:
Anthony Hamlin, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tybetha Will Prosper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02199
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lambert, Roshando Danette Johnson, David Kramer and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Galford et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02023
Plaintiff:
Ernest Cole, Christopher Fowler, Kevin Walsh and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Knight et al
as 0:2017cv04983
Plaintiff:
Dean Scott Johnson and James R. Render
Defendant:
Scott Knight and City of Chaska, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2017cv00080
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron Scott Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nugteren et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02297
Plaintiff:
Greg Thomas Nugteren , Ronald John Addy , Lyle E Matthaei and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Aaron Johnson
as 15-1650
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Aaron Scott Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
