Cases 1 - 10 of 5,877
United States v. Justin Lapping
as 24-2160
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Justin T. Lapping
Murphy v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lammers v. County of Phelps, NE et al
as 8:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps, NE, Natalie Nelson, Shawn Eatherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cranmer v. Securus-J-Pay et al
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Cranmer
Defendant:
Securus-J-Pay, Potosi Correctional Center and Ms. Unknown Sansegraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sutherlin v. AT&T Inc.
as 4:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Sutherlin
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lammers v. County of Phelps NE et al
as 8:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
County of Phelps NE, Phelps County Corrections and Penny Gregg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
