Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mukanzu v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Kachimbe Mukanzu
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Quinn Riess, Matt McLeary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Devontae Horton
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Eric D Tindal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JTH Tax, LLC v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, LLC doing business as Liberty Tax Service
Defendant:
Crystal Davis, Lonna Tindall, Lora Araujo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tindal v. Saul
as 0:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kelly Maureen Tindal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Polk et al v. Tindall et al
as 6:2020cv02008
Defendant:
Waterloo, Iowa, City of and Andrew Tindall
Plaintiff:
Regina Ann Polk and Joseph Alvin Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02082
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brand, Hadrian Cleague, Victor Volynets and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Edward Campbell, Jr. v. State of Iowa, et al
as 19-1931
Defendant / Appellee:
Stuart Werling, Judge, Eric D. Tindal, John Heinecke and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward A. Campbell, Jr.
Edward Campbell, Jr. v. Ft. Madison Prison, et al
as 19-1932
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott County Courthouse, Various Officers, Henry W. Latham, II, Eric D. Tindal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward A. Campbell, Jr.
Campbell v. Ft. Madison Prison et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Davenport Police Department, Eric D. Tindal, Iowa DOC and others
Plaintiff:
Edward A Campbell, Jr.
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
