Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones v. Aeon and Affiliates et al
as 0:2019cv02803
Plaintiff:
Monty Jones
Defendant:
Tai Giwa, Aeon and Affiliates, Juanita Sealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
ASI, Inc. v. Aquawood, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv00763
Defendant:
Ming Yiu Chan, Siu Lun Chan, Yi Man Liu and others
Plaintiff:
ASI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COLE v. ORGANON USA INC. et al
as 4:2018cv01060
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme, N.V. Organon, ORGANON USA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
TAI COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Range v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Tai Range
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Thomisee and T Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jennings et al v. Bonus Building Care, Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Jennings , Marcus Crosdale , Mike Hughes and others
Defendant:
Bonus Building Care, Inc, Bonus of America, Inc., Arleen Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc. et al v. Tai Ping Carpets Americas, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc. and Ameristar Casino St. Charles, Inc.
Defendant:
Tai Ping Carpets Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tay v. Parke Davis & Company LLC
as 4:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Helene Tay
Defendant:
Parke Davis & Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avante International Technology, Inc. et al v. Sequoia Voting Systems
as 4:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ting-Wah Chu, Kevin Kwong-Tai Chung, Avante International Technology, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sequoia Voting Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
