Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Sloan v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2026cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jacob Keith Sloan
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Securus Technologies and Clayton and State Prison Boneville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fotoohighiam v. The City of Columbia Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04182
Defendant:
John Doe, Centurylink Communications, LLC A Foreign Limited Liability Company doing business as Lumen Technologies and Lumen Technologies Group, Matt Vessar and others
Plaintiff:
Mehrdad Fotoohighiam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
McCoy v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Richard McCoy
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kwasi McKinney
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kristian Cotton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Coarey Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Matthew Roberts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dylan Shields
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuelson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Isaac Samuelson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
