Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant: Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff: Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner: Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv05208
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: Immigration Center for Women and Children, Dolores Street Community Services, Immigrant Legal Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
The Regents of the University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04621
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv04592
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: State of California
Not Classified By Court: The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03265
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv03263
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Citizenship Immigration Services and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Immigration Council et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv03266
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: American Immigration Council, Human Rights Watch and American Immigration Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Zepeda Rivas et al v. Jennings et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02731
Plaintiff: DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, JAVIER ALFARO and others
Defendant: Acting Director DAVID JENNINGS, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Geo Group, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Kethikoun Keo, Rachana Duong and Jose Eduardo Guerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv04533
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: Justice & Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?