Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Manina v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Scott Stanton Manina
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heath v. Murillo et al
as 1:2024cv03121
Defendant:
Nate Murillo, Roe Corporations 1-X, Sergio Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
Tyson J Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pleasant et al v. Dunckley
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tralen Robert Doler and Mark Allen Pleasant
Defendant:
Scott David Dunckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Adams v. Robertson et al
as 4:2024cv05053
Defendant:
PhD Caitlin Robertson and Sarah Unknown
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegge v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge and Alvin L Hegge
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Todd Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armatis v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Scott Armatis
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
