Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 545
Friends of the Inyo et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01955
Plaintiff: Friends of the Inyo, Western Watersheds Project, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: U.S. Forest Service and Leeann Murphy
Intervenor Defendant: KORE Mining Limited
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Crow Indian Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35811
Plaintiff / Appellee: CROW INDIAN TRIBE, CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE, STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF WYOMING, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv07360
Plaintiff: Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, Sierra Club, Defend Our Health and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv07171
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Desert Survivors and others
Defendant: Deputy Director Nada Wolff Culver, United States Bureau of Land Management, State Director Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Alaska Wildlife Alliance et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00209
Plaintiff: Alaska Wildlife Alliance, Alaska Wilderness League, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of Interior, Shannon Estenoz and others
Intervenor Defendant: Alaska Oil and Gas Association
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3371
DOW, et al v. American Farm Bureau Federatio, et al
as 21-16382
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and STATE OF UTAH
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION and others
Center for Environmental Health et al v. Regan
as 4:2021cv06166
Plaintiff: Center for Environmental Health, Sierra Club and Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant: Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management
as 2:2021cv01126
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project and Grand Canyon Chapter of the Sierra Club
Defendant: United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Rock Creek Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 21-35457
Plaintiff / Appellee: KSANKA KUPAQA XA'LCIN, EARTHWORKS, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, CHAD BENSON, in his official capacity as Kootenai National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: RC RESOURCES, INC.
Rock Creek Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 21-35456
Plaintiff / Appellee: KSANKA KUPAQA XA'LCIN, EARTHWORKS, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD BENSON, in his official capacity as Kootenai National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: RC RESOURCES, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?