Cases 41 - 50 of 831,729
SOLOMON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02850
Plaintiff:
SANDRA SOLOMON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ingle v. Butler et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Ingle, Jr
Defendant:
Kayla Butler, Noella Alvarez, Lucia Viagas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSANTE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02858
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY POSANTE
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
PEACH et al v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07389
Plaintiff:
DANA PEACH and GEORGE PEACH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
ROBERTS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00992
Petitioner:
LEIAH Z. ROBERTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Williams v. U.S. et al
as 1:2024cv04769
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3771 Crime Victim's Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
