Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Amones et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation. et al
as 3:2024cv02763
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc SII Copes-Vulcan and others
Plaintiff:
Ellen Amones, Johnathan Amones and Reid Amones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sorenson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Defendant:
Canvas Ct LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Inc, Honeywell International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Norita C Sorenson and Reid S Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Crawford v. Armstrong International Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05896
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Morse TEC LLC, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
William H. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Shelton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv04772
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BW/IP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Schuyler and Frank J. Shelton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
