Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Booth v. Inmate Legal Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00982
Plaintiff: Jerrod Len B B Booth
Defendant: Inmate Legal Services, Joseph M Arpaio and Timothy Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastburn et al v. Lane Terrace, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00749
Plaintiff: Yvonne Pascale Behrens and Teri Rae Eastburn
Defendant: Lane Terrace, LLC, SW & W Legal Services, Inc. and Anne Westergaard-Flindt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01417
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01869
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brockmeier v. Porter Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03472
Plaintiff: Carolyn Brockmeier
Defendant: Porter Scott, Phillips Legal Services, Inc., Carl Mandabach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:1982cv00333
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mart Liikane v. Rhonda Baker, et al
as 10-35501
Plaintiff - Appellant: MART LIIKANE
Defendant - Appellee: RHONDA BAKER, JOHN ADAMS, JAMES RUESKEN and others
Liikane v. Baker et al
as 2:2010cv00537
Plaintiff: Mart Liikane
Defendant: Rhonda Baker, John Adams, James Ruesken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. et al v. Hoshino et al
as 1:2009cv00516
Plaintiff: Kokua Legal Services, Inc. and Camelia Johnson
Defendant: Kenneth Hoshino and Doris Hoshino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?