Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Powell v. City of Yakima et al
as 1:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
Elijah Powell
Defendant:
City of Yakima, J Doe City of Yakima Police Officers 1-5, J Doe Spouses 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CHASE BANK N.A. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Nathan Cooley v. City of Inglewood
as 23-55697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF INGLEWOOD, official capacity
Domenic Vilela v. City of Henderson, et al
as 23-15677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMENIC VILELA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HENDERSON and JEREMY C COOLEY
Nathan Cooley v. City of Inglewood
as 2:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cooley
Defendant:
City of Inglewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv02080
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cooley
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Mark A Young, Lisa Sepe-Wienfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cooley
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Inc., Chase Bank N.A. and Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Nathan Cooley
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, ECL Nine LP and Lockhart Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
