Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bridgewater v. RE-PC Recycled Computers & Peripherals
as 2:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Keywanie S Bridgewater
Defendant:
RE-PC Recycled Computers & Peripherals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fidlin v. City of Waldport
as 6:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Richard Fidlin, Coast Towing, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Waldport All Metals Recycling LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant:
City of Waldport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Furry v. City of Albany et al
as 6:2020cv02191
Defendant:
City of Albany, Oregon, Peter Troedsson, Apex Property Clearing and Recycling, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Furry and David Furry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
