Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Warren Johnson v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2022cv05679
Plaintiff:
Warren Johnson
Defendant:
Bank of America and U S Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roy v. Solozar et al
as 2:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Katherine-Apel Johnson, Kierra Bertram, S Raymond and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Marta Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation, et al
as 17-35743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA D. LYALL
Defendant - Appellee:
U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, TRUMAN TITLE 2013 SC3 TITLE TRUST, TRUMAN CAPITAL ADVISORS LP and others
Marta Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation, et al
as 17-35534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA D. LYALL
Defendant - Appellee:
U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, TRUMAN TITLE 2013 SC3 TITLE TRUST, TRUMAN CAPITAL ADVISORS LP and others
Marta Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation, et al
as 17-35506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA D. LYALL
Defendant - Appellee:
U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, TRUMAN TITLE 2013 SC3 TITLE TRUST, TRUMAN CAPITAL ADVISORS LP and others
Marta Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation, et al
as 17-35478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA D. LYALL
Defendant - Appellee:
U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, TRUMAN TITLE 2013 SC3 TITLE TRUST, TRUMAN CAPITAL ADVISORS LP and others
Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation et al
as 2:2017cv00472
Plaintiff:
Marta D Lyall
Defendant:
U S Bank National Assocation , Truman Title 2013 SC3 Title Trust , Truman Capital Advisors LP and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
