Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Booth v. Attorney General of the State of California et al
as 1:2008cv01134
Petitioner:
Patrick J. Booth
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California and Benedetti
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Mackovich v. United States Government, et al
as 08-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN VINCENT MACKOVICH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Jerrod Booth v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 08-16251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, JAMES GARITSON, INAMATE LEGAL SERVICES, All Members of the Department and others
Mr. Lavale Booth v. L. Scribner
as 08-55705
Petitioner - Appellant:
MR. LAVALE BOOTH
Respondent - Appellee:
L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, James Garitson, Inmate Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edward Clarkson v. Hollowell, et al
as 2:2008cv00634
Petitioner:
Edward Clarkson
Respondent:
Hollowell, SCT., Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meister v. Werner et al
as 1:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
David Meister
Defendant:
Natalie Werner, Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00387
Petitioner:
Michael David Booth
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meeks v. Daniels et al
as 3:2007cv01669
Petitioner:
John Morgan Meeks
Respondent:
Charles Daniels, Jerry Wait, Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2007cv01853
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
