Cases 11 - 20 of 345
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Raven Lane
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Fort Peck Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hegge v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge and Alvin L Hegge
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Todd Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. WellPath et al
as 6:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Page
Defendant:
WellPath, Nurse Brittani Standing, HSA Maegan Quillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eisenmann v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02285
Petitioner:
Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Arthur E. Mallory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
