Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Jensen #056119 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00750
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Jensen, Michael Christopher Jensen and Michael Jensen
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forter et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jacob Phillips, Joseph J. Gustin, III, Jack Caudy and others
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters and Governor Kate Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNatt v. Ndoh
as 5:2020cv04921
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael McNatt
Respondent:
Ndoh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Williams Sr et al
as 2:2020cv01267
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams Sr
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez #165631 v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2020cv01218
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Edsel Moore, Susan Novack and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. USA
as 3:2020cv00035
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Love v. Naphcare Medical Department et al
as 2:2019cv00320
Defendant:
Spokane County Detention Center, Naphcare Medical Department and State
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regenold v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv01592
Defendant:
Unknown Waldridge, John Mattos and Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Regenold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Tasker, II v. Jeffrey Uttecht
as 18-35628
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL TASKER II
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Lopez v. Correctional Health Services
as 2:2018cv02065
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services and Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
