Cases 11 - 20 of 184
Nguyen v. Borello et al
as 2:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nam Nguyen
Defendant:
Daryl Borello, Stuart Young, Ms. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Polk Co. Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Andrew Laud Barnett
Defendant:
Polk Co. Jail, Mark Garton, Jeff Isham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Jail Sgt. Lowe, Jail Lt. Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. USMS Jefferson et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Scott Lowe
Defendant:
USMS Jefferson and Dr. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Lanalsikov Lowe
Respondent:
R.A. Heisner and RA Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foley v. Koumal et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Koumal, Scott Lowing, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Danny Lowe
as 22-35935
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANNY RAY LOWE
Lane v. Oregon State Penitentiary
as 6:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Oregon State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
