Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Clyne v. Lee, et al.
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Ben Lee, Seth Radiner, Jeremy Wallingford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randles v. USA
as 2:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Seth Randles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Tran v. Handley
as 3:2022cv05223
Petitioner:
Ba T. Tran
Respondent:
Sethe Handley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Shannon v. Gudino et al
as 2:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Seth Peter Shannon
Defendant:
H. Gudino, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office and San Joaquin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shannon v. Bachand et al
as 2:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Seth Peter Shannon
Defendant:
Victor Bachand, Gregory Dupriest and Allison Barsetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. Fulton County Jail
as 2:2022cv03942
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr. and Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Seth Brown, Melonda Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Valdez et al
as 4:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Unknown Valdez, Unknown Patterson, Unknown Marsk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Trzaska v. Willson et al
as 2:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Edward Seth Trzaska
Defendant:
Willson, Jayme, Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
