Cases 21 - 30 of 1,332
Dean #361554 v. Arizona State Prison Complex, Perryville
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Renae Dean
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison Complex, Perryville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean #361554 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Renae Dean
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazier v. Mora et al
as 4:2023cv06527
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Brazier
Defendant:
S. Mora and Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearson v. USA
as 9:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Robert Dean Spearson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Manes v. United States et al
as 2:2023cv10025
Plaintiff:
Dean Manes
Defendant:
United States, Dr. Awad, Elizabeth Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleury v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01753
Petitioner:
Dean Allen Fleury
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dean Manes v. United States
as 2:2023cv09997
Plaintiff:
Dean Manes
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Hausner et al
as 5:2023cv06022
Plaintiff:
Dean P. Stephens
Defendant:
Dr. Hausner, Dan Gallager, Santa Rosa Parole Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Dean Eads v. David Holbrook
as 5:2023cv02379
Petitioner:
Jerome Dean Eads
Respondent:
David Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
