Cases 31 - 40 of 794
Shawn Goff v. Anthony Coleman, et al
as 22-16176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY COLEMAN, Deputy Warden, THOMPSON, Unknown: replaced with Gerald Thompson as listed in the first amended complaint (doc. 11), KIMBLE, Unknown : current Warden and others
Stern v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Victor Morris Stern
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Morris v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv01088
Petitioner:
Chris Alan Morris
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Roberson v. CDCR et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Morris Roberson
Defendant:
CDCR, D. Chavez, C. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Solorano et al
as 1:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Solorano, Morris and Eckhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Solorano et al
as 2:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Solorano, Morris and Eckhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Gulbrandson v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GULBRANDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, JEFFREY VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison Florence Complex and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison Eyman Complex
Ricky T. Russell v. Nathan Townsend et al
as 5:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ricky T. Russell
Defendant:
Nathan Townsend, M. Houston, Morris, -- and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Richard Acosta et al
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Richard Acosta, Mike Nelson, Jamie Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland #324585 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00473
Defendant:
L Peren, David Shinn, Anthony Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
James Copeland, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
