Cases 31 - 40 of 794
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tidiane Kone v. Justin Brown, et al
as 22-35797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIDIANE KONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BROWN, Lieutenant, COX, SSgt, LAPINSKAS and others
Shawn Goff v. Anthony Coleman, et al
as 22-16176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY COLEMAN, Deputy Warden, THOMPSON, Unknown: replaced with Gerald Thompson as listed in the first amended complaint (doc. 11), KIMBLE, Unknown : current Warden and others
Morris v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv01088
Petitioner:
Chris Alan Morris
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Roberson v. CDCR et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Morris Roberson
Defendant:
CDCR, D. Chavez, C. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Victor Morris Stern
Respondent:
State of Alaska
(PC) Baker v. Solorano et al
as 2:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Solorano, Morris and Eckhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Solorano et al
as 1:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Solorano, Morris and Eckhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Gulbrandson v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GULBRANDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, JEFFREY VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison Florence Complex and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison Eyman Complex
Copeland #324585 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00473
Defendant:
L Peren, David Shinn, Anthony Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
James Copeland, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
