Cases 41 - 50 of 1,341
Jones v. Stolk et al
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Defendant:
Sgt Stolk, Chet Rigney, Lt Rigney and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
Ashenafi Aberha v. D. Jones, et al
as 22-16658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHENAFI G. ABERHA
Defendant / Appellee:
D. JONES, Nurse, COX, Sergeant and WILLIAM GETTERE, Warden
Tidiane Kone v. Justin Brown, et al
as 22-35797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIDIANE KONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BROWN, Lieutenant, COX, SSgt, LAPINSKAS and others
Dennis Underwood v. Cox, et al
as 22-35782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
COX, JANELL ROCHESTER, ROJAS and others
Bonds v. Brandt et al
as 3:2022cv05490
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Traivon Bonds
Defendant:
Brandt, Emily Cox and Gregory L Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
W Walker, Martha Dominguez, Unknown Russom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Leon N Wilmot, Robert Arriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Server et al
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bryce P. Cox
Defendant:
Collyn Server, Montana State Prison and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bailey v. Cox, et al.
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bailey
Defendant:
T. Cox, W. Gunn, J Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
