Cases 41 - 50 of 623
Lee v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Darrell Glenn Sr. Lee
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Rivadeneyra et al
as 4:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
C Rivadeneyra, C Newland, Unknown Guttierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv09120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Walter Glenn Compton v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv08918
Plaintiff:
Walter Glenn Compton
Defendant:
D. Samuel and Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younan v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Stewart E Younan
Defendant:
David Shinn, Christopher Josefowicz, Mario DeFranco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Carpenter
as 1:2022cv03160
Petitioner:
Glenn James Campbell and Glenn James Mollett
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby #178508 v. Stewart et al
as 2:2022cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Kirby
Defendant:
Rodney Stewart, Glenn Pacheco, Unknown Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mikeal Stine v. B. Von Blankensee, et al
as 22-16142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant / Appellee:
B. VON BLANKENSEE, Complex Warden, USP/Tucson, Arizona, SEGAL, Unknown; Associate Warden USP/Tucson Arizona, HAIGH BIEHLER, Clinical Director, USP/Tucson, Arizona and others
(PC) Townsend v. Parrish et al
as 1:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Joseph Townsend
Defendant:
Patrick Parrish, M. Sevy, N. Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
