Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Garcia v. Beard et al
as 1:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
Felipe Garcia
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Jerry Brown, Kim Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Foulk, et al.
as 2:2014cv00972
Plaintiff:
Scott Emerson
Defendant:
F. Foulk, Carrera, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2014cv00471
Petitioner:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott Felix v. S. Mayberg, et al
as 14-15255
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT EMERSON FELIX
Respondent - Appellee:
S. MAYBERG, Dr., DMH Director, P. HEDGE, Sheriff and P. VASQUEZ, Warden
Emerson v. Garcia et al
as 2:2013cv02405
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Jeanette Garcia, Karen L O'Conner, Washington State UCC Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv01989
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Emerson Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Correctional Officer Waner et al
as 4:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael John Stewart
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Waner , Martin Frink , Correctional Officer Roehrige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Buren v. Willard et al
as 1:2013cv01273
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
J. D. Willard, E. Wilson, N. Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Sees the Ground, Jr. v. C. Emerson, et al
as 13-35733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON SEES THE GROUND, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. C. EMERSON and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Correll v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01380
Petitioner:
Michael Emerson Correll
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
