Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Mason #168331 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv02551
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hal Mason, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason
as 5:2024cv04770
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Mason, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gable v. Ackom et al
as 6:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Karl Nelson, William Pierce, Emil Brandaw and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Mack Mason
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Emily Claire Mason
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Hansen et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Kevin Hansen, David Guidrey, Randy Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windsor v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Prince' Amelio Mason Windsor, I and Maximus Windor-Mountbatten
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Campos, S. Renn, B. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beggs v. Mason
as 1:2024cv03002
Petitioner:
Forrest Arthur Beggs
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
