Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Amos Jones v. Pagliari
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Amos Jones
Defendant:
Richard M. Pagliari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan, et al
as 22-35884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. MORGAN, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRAKES and others
Walton #037353 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
Geary Wayne Walton
Defendant:
David Shinn, C Amos, S Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Leah Lucas, Russell S. Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv00615
Petitioner:
Seth Amos Nelson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nelson v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv00614
Petitioner:
Seth Amos Nelson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DaJuan Williams v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAJUAN TORRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections, C. AMOS, Eyman Complex Inmate Trust Account Business Manager, JOHN DOE, named as Doe #1, ADC Central Office ITA Business Manager and others
Jones v. Perez-Pantoja et al
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Amos Jones
Defendant:
I. Perez-Pantoja and A. Turingan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02151
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
David Shinn, C Amos, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
